[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [engelang] [OT] Re: [lojban] Binary Language



pc:
> araizen@hidden.email writes:
> 
>   I once thought about implementing a "reverse polish" loglan which
>   would be more or less isomorphic to lojban, i.e. all terminators and
>   scope-marking would be implicit in the structure of the grammar
>   *without* using explicit words
> 
> Can you really do this.  Logic gets away with it by clear sentence 
> beginnings, HP by hitting the invisible "enter" key; how does a 
> language as complex as Lojban manage 

RP would be murder, I reckon: you'd not be able to parse until you
hit the end of the sentence. Livagian, my engelang, uses polish (i.e.
head-first), and also allows no unmarked variation in the number and 
ordering of a word's dependents. The result is that it can be unambiguously
parsed incrementally with no lookahead and no backtracking. Flexibility
of constituent order is achieved by having devices that explicitly
mark reorderings and changes to the number of a word's dependents.

--And.