[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Why, because



> 
> The only thing I have against this is that it's a two-syllable, and 
a shorter would, I think, be 
> better.
> 
> Also, I could redefine 'kaw' to mean 'because', taking away its 
verbal sense.
> 
> zi ven kwakaw?
> 
> Then, 'therefore' could be formed with 'co', which refers to the 
preceeding phrase.
> 
> zi pa ciq go, kaw co go ven.
> 
> I'm beginning to like this last idea better.  Reactions?
>

I like your last suggestion, just because I like the way kaw co 
works. Also I just don't like the way sarno/sonra sounds when I say 
it.