[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ceqli] impressionable




On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Jim Henry wrote:



But just because your language contains a schwa phone doesn't
make it easy for you to pronounce on command in contexts where
you're not used to it, if it's not phonemic in your native language.
Like many English speakers have nonphonemic initial /C/
in words like "huge", but still have trouble with final /C/ in
German "ich" etc.  And if you're not used to hearing it phonemically,
you might have trouble distinguishing it aurally from /e/ or /a/ --
when other people pronounce /k@.tS@.'pe/ you might hear
/ka.tSa.'pe/ and think it's three Tceqli morphemes instead
of one.


Good points.  Another, whackier idea that's been discussed is to
make the 'e' the buffering phoneme, and require it, not make it
optional.  The downside is that it can't be used as anything -but-
the buffering phoneme.  Thus, in effect, reducing the vowel
inventory to four.

So you'd have ketcepa.  Or, ke-che-PAH, because the e's don't
count as vowels for stress purposes.

Another problem with it is that we'd have to decide which clusters
need the buffer and which don't  ketcepa or ketecepa?

I don't really like this, but thinking about it might lead to a better
idea down the road.

Rex May
rmay@hidden.email
See some of my cartoons at:
http://homepage.mac.com/rmay/
NOW UPDATED REGULARLY!