[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ceqli] reversals




On Dec 8, 2005, at 7:10 AM, Jim Henry wrote:

On 12/2/05, Rex May <rmay@hidden.email> wrote:
I want to maximize Ceqli's ability to make antonyms by reversal. For example, I'm dropping "pomo" (to help) and borrowing "zuai" (to hinder) from Mandarin, making possible the
reversal "ziau" for help.

Now I'm wondering about "ten". The opposite of have is lack, or the preposition 'without.' So I'm thinking of reserving 'ten' for 'to hold' and searching for a reversable morpheme that can serve those two meanings. I could use "sin" for to lack, without, and reverse it to "sni"
for "to have," but it seems unaesthetic.

Maybe these problems are evidence you should
reconsider the wholen notion of reversing
the faloba phonemes for oppositeness.
It's nifty, but it seems it would make
coining new words and maintaining
the dictionary harder than it needs to be
because of constantly taking care
about possible reversals.

Or keep the reversal-pairs for a few of
the most frequent words, but use an
oppositeness affix for most others,
and make it clear that reversal-oppositeness
 is not a productive process

I quite agree. I'm just in the process of looking at the vocabulary as it is, and seeing if some more reversals are indeed possible and desirable. I think I'm going too far with fooling with 'ten,' actually, it's just too handy a word.

Rex May
rmay@hidden.email
See some of my cartoons at:
http://homepage.mac.com/rmay/
NOW UPDATED REGULARLY!