[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ceqli] topic



On 10/18/05, Rex May <rmay@hidden.email> wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Jim Henry wrote:
> It should have the same position relative
> to its headword as other modifier particles.
> Don't most such particles precede
> their head in ceqli?

> Hm.  I think you're right.  But before we get too deep into this, how about saying.

> "The topic of a sentence is normally the same as the subject, which comes first.  If another word is the topic, it should come first:

Let's see.  Assuming the listener can tell at
once whether a word is a noun (or pronoun) or verb
-- or which way it is being used in a given context --
then a sentence will parse to one of these patterns:

NVN
VNN
NNV

which the listener needs to be able to match
up unambiguously with the permissible V/S/O word
orders.  He can do that if you allow only

SVO
VSO
OSV

And then your three permitted word orders
would correspond to topicalizing any one of
the three main sentence constituents.  That
probably works just as well.  The only way
it would be ambiguous is if in some
cases it's uncertain if a given word is being
used in its noun or its verb sense.

--
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang.htm
...Mind the gmail Reply-to: field