[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- In ceqli@yahoogroups.com, MorphemeAddict@w... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/10/2005 9:55:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> jimhenry1973@g... writes:
>
>
> > My understanding is that Lojban started as a relex of Loglan, but
> > their grammars have diverged over the years. Is that so?
> > To what extent?
> >
>
> This is basically true.
> Lojban's grammar expanded and filled out, too, until its baseline a few years
> ago, so it's more complete than Loglan.
>
> Reading L1 ("Loglan: a logical language") will still provide a useful base
> for understanding *how* Lojban works, but almost none of the vocabulary is the
> same, and Lojban word formation is more regular.
Interesting. How is it more regular?