[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Name suffix



--- In ceqli@yahoogroups.com, Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@g...> wrote:
> On 6/15/05, Rex May <rmay@m...> wrote:
> > To summarize, then, names will behave like pronouns in Ceqli. That
> > is, there need be no 'ti' the-word to set them off.  They will be
> > marked by a bound morpheme suffix.  We need to have a concensus on
> > what that suffix will be.  Using so-far unassigned CV's, we have -
se
> 
> > -zo is also available
> 
> > I'm slightly inclined towards -zo, largely because the syllable 
will
> > very often be embedded between the name and another compounding
> > element, and it seems to be easier to hear.
> 
> I like -zo slightly better than -se; your earlier idea of
> /Ze/, "ye", was pretty good too.  But I don't see a big 
> difference among them.
>
Because the name particle will frequently follow nasals and liquids, 
which are voiced, it's easier to have the name particle begin with a 
voiced consonant too. "ze" or "zo" is fine; "ze" seems less 
stressed, "zo" seems clearer.
 
> > The problem is with multi-element names like kraun sulkizo.  
Should
> > it be kraunzo sulkizo, or do we need a spoken hyphen to hook them
> > together?  I'm inclined to the hyphen, so we won't wonder if we're
> > dealing with two names or one.  Also a problem with names like 
South
> > Korea.  Or Never-Never Land, or Big Rock Candy Mountain.
> 

> Again, personally I incline to different suffixes to mark personal 
names,
> family names, place names.... But you seem inclined to mark the type
> of thing named by the name with a separate common noun morpheme,
> which makes sense too.  So I would go with the spoken hyphen; it 
seems
> to fit the patterns of ceqli better.
> 

I see the name particle as also serving as a hyphen to any 
immediately following name. Whether two names are seen as one name 
modifying another, or one being an appositive to the other, or just 
two names in a row, is there any doubt that they both must refer to 
the same thing?

Having said that, I find a general-purpose spoken hyphen 
indispensible in Konya. So I can hardly argue against it.

> > So I'm proposing -zo as the name suffix, and -se- as the hyphen.  
How
> > about it?
> > 
> > And I think foreign names should simply be bracketed just like any
> > foreign word.  For that, we need a CV and a beCV.  After being
> > bracketed, it can take the -zo and proceed as a name as tho it 
were
> > Ceqli.
> > 
> > And, we need a smooth way to handle Latin nomenclature, as in Homo
> > Sapiens.  Maybe more bracketing CV's

I'll think about that when I'm more awake. :-)

> 
> Probably one pair of particles to bracket foreign proper names, 
> and another to mark foreign common nouns -- not just Latin
> species names, but anything else (clothing, foodstuff, game)
> that's too specific to one culture to need a ceqli form with an 
> official lexicon entry:
> sporran, kimono, grits, Parcheesi, ....
> 
> -- 
> Jim Henry
> http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/review/log.htm