[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Xyen



> Then maybe you should drop them.
> 
> >   I'm
> > thinking it should be xien and xiu, with two distinct syllables, 
to preclude
> > that danger.  I think I made the first forms because the origin 
words, from
> > French and Chinese, are listed as monosyllabic, though I 
have my doubts
> > about "chien".   It sounds like two syllables to me.
> 
> "chien", "rien", and "bien" are all monosyllabic, 
> at least in the standard 
> French dialect I learned in college.

The dictionary agrees with you.  I think I tend to make two 
syllables simply because thy /j/ tends to get obscured, which 
reinforces the idea that they'd better be dispensed with.

> Or, better, a few simple rules about which
> _kinds_ of phoneme can be combined with
> which other kinds of phoneme and in what order.
> 
> E.g.: an initial syllable can begin with any of these:
> 
> C | ZG | SK | ZL | SL | KL | GL
> 
> where Z = voiced fricative, S =unvoiced fricative,
> K = unvoiced stop, G = voiced stop, C = any consonant, L = 
liquid (l or r).
> 
> I would recommend against the combinations like
> KS | GZ, or against clustering an affricate 
> with just about anything else.
> I don't find them hard to pronounce, but
> lots of people do; and I do sometimes find
> them hard to distinguish acoustically from the plain fricatives
> without the initial stop when
> other people pronounce them.  But the same argument 
applies _a fortiori_
> to the affricates, which seem to be embedded 
> pretty solidly in ceqli.  Easy pronouncability
> is obviously not your highest goal, but one to
> be balanced with others; it's up to you to say
> how much ease of pronunciation you're willing
> to give up to achieve other goals (e.g. having many
> words with few syllables).
> 
> The rule above needs to be expanded to show
> which consonants the semivowels (y, w) are allowed
> to follow.  You might rule out either of them 
> following any consonant at roughly the same point
> of articulation, i.e. not only sy, xy, cy, zy, jy, ny
> but also  pw, bw, mw.

I'm beginning to think that maybe the following vowel here is 
more important than the leading consonant.  I mean, for me,

pwa, pwe, pwi

are easy to say and hear, but pwo and pwu are not.

In like manner, tho maybe to a lesser degree, I find

 cya, xya, sya

rather better than cye, xye, sye.

But not by much, so I'd decide to prohibit c/x/s+y.  There.  I just 
decided it.

And prohibit at least the combos yi, wo, and wu.

How's this list sound for cwaba?

B+L, R, W, Y
C+W
D+L, R, W, Y
F+L, R, W, Y
G+L, R. W, Y
H+L, R
J+W
K+L, R. W, Y
P+L, R. W, Y
S+F, K, L, M, N, P, R, T, W
T+L, R, W, Y
V+L, R, W, Y
X+K, L, M, N, P, R, T, V, W
Z+B, D, G, L, R, W, Y

Oh, and no double anything allowed, vowels or consonants.

and for semivowels, it's easier, I think, to list what's prohibited:

yi, wu, wo, ow, uw, iy

And 2 nasals and liquids in any combination are permitted as 
long as they're bracketed by vowels.  A few n/l pairs are allowed 
to end a morpheme ? A vowel must go before, but none is 
needed afterward:

RN, RM  LN, LM

A maximum of three vowels can appear in a cluster, and these 
combinations are disallowed:

OU, EI, UO

Does that adequately cover it?  I think most of the words I'll have 
to change are the c/x/s+y one.