[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [txeqli] Re: Glosa fu/du/pa (was: Aspect)



on 4/4/02 9:29 AM, Rex May - Baloo at rmay@hidden.email wrote:

> on 4/4/02 8:51 AM, kevinbsmith at yahoogroups@hidden.email wrote:
> 
>> --- In txeqli@y..., "John Schilke" <doc@c...> wrote:
>>> Glosa has this business of "fu," "du," "pa" for tenses (only
>>> if needed) and often it remains unused.
>> 
>> As a semi-fluent Glosa speaker, I have to chime in here. On a
>> side note, there is some substantial disagreement on the Glosa
>> list right now about tense, aspect, etc. It seems that the Glosa
>> system isn't quite complete.
>> 
>> Anyway, the real point I wanted to make is that in Glosa, these
>> tense markers (plus "nu" [now]) double as verb phrase markers.
>> When you encounter one, you know you have left the subject and
>> are entering the verb. Similarly, "u" and "plu" are the main
>> noun phrase markers that let you know the verb is finished.
>> There seem to be others, like "mi", but there is no concrete list
>> so it is open to interpretation.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, because these markers are optional, it is often
>> difficult to parse sentences correctly. Generally it is possible
>> by context, but often it requires one or more restarts because
>> you hit a dead end.
>> 
>> One example was when I recently said "mi volu auxi". I intended
>> the meaning as "I want to-help", but it can equally be
>> interpreted as "I want assistance". Even if I had said "mi nu
>> volu auxi", it wouldn't have helped.
>> 
>> The only way my meaning would be clear would be if the NP marker
>> was required instead of being optional. Then, because I didn't
>> say "mi nu volu u auxi", readers would KNOW that auxi was still
>> part of the verb phrase.
>> 
>> I hope Ceqli is able to avoid this confusion. I strongly believe
>> that you should be able to parse almost any sentence in one try.
>> It may take some context to grasp the intended meaning, but not
>> the intended structure.
> 
> Hm.  That is a problem.  Let's see.  In Ceqli it would be
> 
> Go vol pomo.  which is short for.
> Go vol ke go pomo.
> 
> Now, to say I want asstance....
> 
> Go vol bepomo.   I want to-be-helped.  short for
> Go vol ke go bepomo.
> 
> Of course, pomoka is an act of helping, so could say
> Go vol pomoka.
> 
> If you mean some kind of tangible help, like money, could say
> Go vol pomoxo.
> 
> However, this whole thing leads  me to wonder if maybe the thing to do is go
> with the Loglan system, which started this whole thing anyway.  If we did,
> here's what we'd have:
> 
> 1. Except for some grammatical particles, everything is a verb.
> 
> Go pomo.   I help.
> 
> To pomo sa kan  The help dog.  dog who helps.
> 
> To pomo.  The helper, one who helps, which we now signify by 'pomovo'.
> 
> In this case, the rule would have to change and there could be no more
> sentences like 
> Kan pomo felin.  Dog helps cat.
> We'd have to make it explicit that a noun is a noun.
> 
> Te kan da pomo te felin.  Dog helps cat.
> 
> Te being the default noun marker that can be definite/indefinite, whatever.
> 
> And if we do that, why not go ahead and reserve CV(V) for grammar words that
> do _not_ behave that way?  I say not because it's just too darn arbitrary.
> The number of grammar words should be small enough to memorize.
> 
> Anybody want to Loglanize the predicates of Ceqli this way?  Mike, this wd
> maybe give it some internal consistency that you feel a lack of.

Actually, -I- don't want to do this.  I think the thing about Ceqli is that
some words are nouns and some are adjective/verb/prepositions.  There is no
non-noun meaning for kan, pe, xo, zo, xi, cer, cam, etc.  Likewise,
non-nouns can only become nouns by being converted somehow.  Bon can't be a
noun, but it can become bonka, goodness, bonpe, goodperson, bonxo another
kind of goodness, bonvo, etc.  In this, Ceqli is more like Mandarin, except
that we flat out -can't- do things like 'man the torpedoes'.  A noun can
become a verb by some sort of ending, maybe, but it can't be a verb without
that.
-- 
>PLEASE NOTE MY NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS: rmay@hidden.email
> Rex F. May (Baloo)
> Daily cartoon at: http://www.cnsnews.com/cartoon/baloo.asp
> Buy my book at: http://www.kiva.net/~jonabook/gdummy.htm
> Language site at: http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Uploadexp.htm
>Discuss my auxiliary language at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/txeqli/