[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 06:27:09PM -0800, Mike Wright wrote: > I think so, but I'd tend to retain the combination with "vo", thus > keeping "kul", "ci", "jaw", and so on as true modifiers, rather than > sometimes modifier, sometimes noun--just for the feeling of > consistency. (But is "vo" a particle, as advertised, or is it a noun? > Could it be considered a kind of all-purpose pronoun?) I find it interesting that you consider having a distinction between modifiers and nouns to be more consistent than having no distinction. -- Rob Speer