[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
on 2/28/02 6:24 PM, guildyank at lsulky@hidden.email wrote: > If we're really pressed for glyphs, would we consider using the > uppercase forms where they don't too closely resemble their lowercase > counterparts? That would yield these additionals: > > A B D E F? G H I? L? M N Q R T > > Klingon transliterated orthography does this. Looks lousy, by the > way, but that's just an esthetic thing :) . Yes, and Klingon certainly doesn't need to. It is terribly unesthetic, and confusing. I'd rather admit accented letters, but we really don't need to. -- >PLEASE NOTE MY NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS: rmay@hidden.email > Rex F. May (Baloo) > Daily cartoon at: http://www.cnsnews.com/cartoon/baloo.asp > Buy my book at: http://www.kiva.net/~jonabook/gdummy.htm > Language site at: http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Uploadexp.htm >Discuss my auxiliary language at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/txeqli/