[YG Conlang Archives] > [Latejami group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [Ladekwa] jawjeacambambembomi to sa bikwa to

Yes, I was thinking that you should have used A/P/F-d as well. And then middle- and anti-middle-voice operations would have suppressed both the agent and the patient cases, leaving only the focus case left exposed, which is the one you want. But as you say, that would be quite a mouthful!

On 09/11/05, MorphemeAddict@hidden.email <MorphemeAddict@hidden.email > wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/2005 6:26:49 PM Central Standard Time, geoff.hacker@hidden.email writes:


I've been thinking about your word "jawjeacambembomi". Instinctively, I don't like the idea of having to perform both a middle- and an anti-middle-voice operation on the same word. It sounds like the effect of doing this is to place the emphasis on the whole performance of the translation, so shouldn't you instead use the whole performance classifier "kay" to get "jawjeakay", hence "jawjeakay to sa bikwa to"?



Maybe, but I don't make up roots; I only suggest them.  In this case, I was trying to use a word we already have ("jawjeaca") to derive the meaning I wanted, namely, the result of the activity.  I'm not sure that the middle + anti-middle is correct, but I think I should have used the A/P/F-d suffix "-mba" first:  jawjeacambambembomi.  What a mouthful!

stevo

SPONSORED LINKS
Online social science degree Social science course Social science degree
Social science education Bachelor of social science Social science major

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS