[YG Conlang Archives] > [Latejami group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Hi Stevo, It depends on the definition. Seemingly I'm the only one that finds result/interpretation interesting enough. I will keep on thinking about this problem, and if I find out something, I'll let you know. Bye, Stefo --- In Ladekwa@yahoogroups.com, MorphemeAddict@w... wrote: > > In a message dated 10/20/2005 9:30:30 AM Central Standard Time, > sts@s... writes: > > > > I thought that the AP nature of "read" is because of the fact that a > > reader has to keep oneself reading. If we change that structure to > > A/P, then someone would keep another one reading, which is not "to > > read something to someone" (and this example remains interesting). > > > > > > As I understand it, A is the reader: P is the person read to; (and F is the > material read.) Reading to oneself makes the reader AP. > > stevo >