[YG Conlang Archives] > [Latejami group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Re: [Ladekwa] Re: 4th core argument?
- From: MorphemeAddict@hidden.email
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:01:33 EDT
- Subject: Re: [Ladekwa] Re: 4th core argument?
- To: Ladekwa@yahoogroups.com
In a message dated 10/20/2005 9:30:30 AM Central Standard Time, sts@hidden.email writes:
I thought that the AP nature of "read" is because of the fact that a
reader has to keep oneself reading. If we change that structure to
A/P, then someone would keep another one reading, which is not "to
read something to someone" (and this example remains interesting).
As I understand it, A is the reader: P is the person read to; (and F is the material read.) Reading to oneself makes the reader AP.
stevo