[YG Conlang Archives] > [Latejami group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
OK, you're right. And I did not say that deontic disjuncts or a prefix meaning "mis" would not work in Ladekwa. This was just the next step towards generalization (a fourth core argument). Back to step number one: would you still translate "the sign reads 'stop'" as you did before? Bye, Stefo --- In Ladekwa@yahoogroups.com, MorphemeAddict@w... wrote: > > In a message dated 10/17/2005 5:27:19 PM Central Standard Time, > sts@s... writes: > > > > We don't have A/P/F/R structures (R - result), although deontic disjuncts > > remind me of that: the speaker interprets a situation as, for example, > > > > But the deontic disjunct itself contains the idea of necessity, so no > additional arguments are necessary. > > stevo >