[YG Conlang Archives] > [texperanto group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

The endings and avoidance of homonyms



Esperanto has the 'sukero' problem.  That is, 'suker' is the root for 'sugar,' but it can also be 
read as 'suk-ero,' meaning a 'drop of juice.'  Texperanto intends to avoid such things as 
much as possible.  The first draft of the endings, at
http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Texperanto.html
is little changed from the Esperanto endings.  Now, I'm inclined to try to revise them so that 
there will be less likelihood of sukeros cropping up.   For example, there are many roots that 
Texperanto might have that end in -aro.  There'd be much less chance of a problem if the -
aro (group of) ending were replaced by something somewhat more complicated, or at least 
less likely to end a root.  This goes for just about all endings in VC (vowel plus consonant), 
but we don't want a set of weird endings either.  They should be pronouncable, esthetic, and 
unlikely to clash with roots.   Finally, they should be somewhat easy to learn by being derived 
from natural languages wherever possible, all things being equal.

I already got rid of the -ero, replacing it with -isko (sort of from Russian iskra, 'spark'), but 
that was to liberate the -ero so it could be used as the masculine equivalent of -ino.  

So, let's see what we can replace -aro with:  My first thought is -ugo, faintly suggesting the 
English 'group.'  And a root is less likely to end in -ug than in -ar, I believe.  Another 
possibility would be -arzo, which preserves the -ar but adds a suggestion of plurality.

I'm open to suggestions.