[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: In which groups can romlangs be devided?

• From: "thomasruhm" <thomas@hidden.email>
• Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:23:19 -0000
• Subject: Re: In which groups can romlangs be devided?
• To: romconlang@yahoogroups.com

> Actually, as I've been writing the introduction to my Dravean  
> reference grammar today, I've been pondering exactly the same thing.
>

I did not find anything about Dravean. Is it a completely constructed language or is it like Dalmatian?

For all:
Is there a tradition in making improbable romanic orientated conlangs, if one doesn't count auxlangs?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [romconlang] Re: In which groups can romlangs be devided?
    • From: Deiniol Jones <deiniolabioan@hidden.email>

• References:
  • Re: [romconlang] In which groups can romlangs be devided?
    • From: Deiniol Jones <deiniolabioan@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [romconlang] In which groups can romlangs be devided?
• Next by Date: Re: [romconlang] Re: In which groups can romlangs be devided?
• Previous by thread: Re: [romconlang] In which groups can romlangs be devided?
• Next by thread: Re: [romconlang] Re: In which groups can romlangs be devided?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread