[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- On Wed, 4/28/10, Capsicum <thomas@hidden.email> wrote: >Yesterday I read the article on Wikipedia about mouflons in Interlingua >and was supprised how well I understand it. I tried the other two before >but I don't remember how much I understood. This is not really an appropriate forum for discussion of auxlangs as such, but as conlangs of a reasonably Romance sort, of the three, I think Interlingua flows the best and is most easily understood. For me, it is the most aesthetically pleasing of the three. Ido goes a long way towards sweetening Esperanto's look and feel. Esperanto looks and sounds ugly. As far as understandability goes, I think all of the romaclones amount to six of one, half dozen of the other. Anyone who speaks Spanish or Italian should have no trouble at all with any of them; French and Romanian are a different kettle of kippers entirely. As for romaclones you don't mention: LSF is also quite aesthetically pleasing, as is LFN. Of course, there is LF / Sabir itself -- https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/corre/www/franca/edition3/texts.html And a curious Algerian French that seems to use the same name, but seems to be more French than it is Sabir / LF: http://www.alger-roi.net/Alger/sabir/sabir.htm Padraic