[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] (Long) Re: Etymology of Ibero-Romance "Pequeño" and Cognates



I should have noted that the Rumanian word _pu,tin_
(actually with a t with comma below \u0163 or \u021B)
is an regular reflex of PU:TI:NUS, remarkable only
in that it must be an early loan from another
Romance variety where -I:NUS remained productive.
Those things happen too!

On 2008-08-28 Scotto Hlad wrote:
Thanks so much for this!
Scotto
-----Original Message----- From: romconlang@yahoogroups.com [mailto:romconlang@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Benct Philip Jonsson
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 3:10 AM
To: romconlang@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [romconlang] (Long) Re: Etymology of Ibero-Romance "Pequeño" and Cognates Since the issue has recently come up both in a private correspondence and on this list I looked up my old notes concerning that mysterious Romance root for 'small, little'. The most likely story goes something like this:

In Latin there was a word PU:TUS, meaning '(small)
boy'. In Vulgar Latin this word had a variant
*PUTTUS, since there was a general tendency for
V:C and VC: (long vowel + single consonant and
short vowel + long/double consonant) to alternate
with each other, and then by analogy or dialect
mixture a third variant *PU:TTUS with both the
stressed vowel and the following consonant
long[^note 1]: .