[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@hidden.email> wrote: [...] we > hardly take > any liberty if we assume it for the VL underlying > Germano- > Romance! Pre-Slavic even had is > iS > ix, and > Swedish went > through sj > S > X in recent centuries. Some > Indo-Aryan > dialects apparently went through S > x > k_h -- > presumably > because speakers of dialects which lacked /x/ used > /k_h/ > to emulate the [x] sound. > You've convinced me (not hard, because we need /x/!). So we have Lat /sj/ > Rom /S/ > GmRom/NRom /x/. :) What was your answer ref #/dj/? Couldn't tell if you were agreeing with #/dj/ or #/j/. My preference is #/j/.