[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: 3rd person pronouns - Einglek



Thanks for the quick reply.

I've thought about something like that (*ILLE-IPSE/*IPSE-ILLE) but the
results turn out too long for a 3rd person pronoun.  

Another thing I've tried is reworking the sound changes by starting
with Classical Latin long-short vowel system (about 10 vowels) instead
of Vulgar Latin's 7 thus making it easier to make my English-like
sound changes closer to the real thing.  I also reduce the amount of
final vowel reduction.  Doing that, I have much less leveling and
retain enough final vowel distinctions for gender distinction.

Still, I'd like any more ideas for 3rd person pronouns for a romance lang.

-G


--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> wrote:
>
> What about compounding?
> I haven't working on my romance conlang in a while, so i've forgotten  
> what they look like in different genders and cases, but could you  
> have something like *ILLE-IPSE be one gender pronoun and *IPSE-ILLE  
> be the other one?  Or similar compounding of pronouns and/or pronoun- 
> like words?
> 
> -Stephen (Steg)
> 
> 
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:35 AM, funkymonkey1148 wrote:
> 
> > Hello all!  Long time lurker here, but first post.
> >
> > I'm working on a conlang that applies English-like sound changes to
> > Vulgar Latin (changes from about the pre-West Germanic era up to the
> > British-American split).  It's not exact, but so far I generally like
> > the results.
> >
> > In this conlang, tentatively called "Einglek," the many sound changes
> > have leveled the verb conjugations (happy with that), leveled the
> > cases (don't mind that) and have led me to get rid of grammatical
> > gender (at first annoyed me, but is growing on me).  The problem is
> > that I'd still like to have gendered 3rd person pronouns to
> > distinguish male/female beings.  So far, using ILLE or IPSE produces
> > too similar pronouns.  Perhaps I could use IS, but then the feminine
> > accusative singular comes out equal to the nominative.
> >
> > Any other suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > romconlang-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>