[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Austronesian-Romance



Padraic mentioned starting a new thread for this topic, to not take
the limelight off of lethino pronouns.

Anyway, Roger Mills has been incredibly helpful, but as I am not a
linguist, I'm a touch bewildered. But, he's essentially whittled
things down to:

"Latin and Proto-Austronesian had similar consonant inventories except
for /f/, which PAn lacks".

The problem though is manhandling latin polysyllabic words to fit them
into a PAn bi-syllabic structure (which Tagalog still favors for base
roots: inom, kain, luto, aral, etc), although there are attested
trisyllabic bases which got reduced, such as *paNudan > pandan
(Pandanus) by dropping the middle vowel. My thought was to eliminate
the unstressed syllables, much like what Spanish already has done on
its way to becoming its modern self. Roger then suggested doing that,
then dealing with clusters (which PAn had few). The easiest way would
be to reduce them down, either assimilation, or just getting rid of
one in favor of the strongest, except perhaps where nasal + consonant
comes into play.

Thoughts?