[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- "Padraic Brown" <elemtilas@hidden.email> wrote:> > Sounds perfect! What exactly is the problem > again? Erm, a feasible, comprehensibile morphology?...Look at it like this: it's _natural_! Real languages end up with mix-n-match forms of this sort.
Natural by all means - the last thing I want is some regularised esperantine muck; but when your grammar and syntax fly out the window, because you have as many declensions as you do nouns; then you know it may be time for some "fine tuning..."
It was *all* mix, an *no* match! :)Peter