[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] New Conlang: Terkunan



--- Henrik Theiling <theiling@hidden.email> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Padraic Brown writes:
> > --- theiling@hidden.email wrote:
> >..
> > > I would like to announce my new romlang
> > > Terkunan [tErku'nan] or
> > > 'Tarragonian'.  It was designed to be what
> I
> > > feel is an elegant
> > > romlang derived from Vulgar Latin.  In
> contrast
> > > to �rj�trunn, there is
> > > not one strict set of sound changes taken
> from
> > > another existing
> > > natlang, but a set compiled by my personal
> > > preferences.  (Are there
> > > names to distinguish these two types of
> > > conlangs?)
> >
> > I might suggest "Historical Conlang" (derived
> > from "historical novel") because these
> particular
> > languages are based on historical models and
> > primary world phonologies.
> >
> > The others are just normal artlangs -- their
> > basis is as much artistic in nature as
> realistic.
> 
> Yes, that sounds sensible.  Could we name the
> difference by using
> 'historical romlang/artlang' vs. 'diachronical
> romlang/artlang'?  The
> former based on real history, the second,
> although also using a
> consistent conhistory, on a fictional set of
> rules?

I'm sure such a distinction could be made, but
I'm not sure it would matter. The difference is
still one of an historical model v. pure
aesthetics, right? Or did I miss something?

> >...
> > Well, I can tell thee right away that I
> _love_
> > the sound of this language!
> 
> Thanks, that is a nice achievement! :-)
> 
> > Though I wonder why sometimes the final -um
> drops off and sometimes
> > it becomes -e? Will look more later!
> 
> The -e is left if the final cluster is
> categorised unpronouncible in
> isolation.  Phonology allows only single
> alveolars, and only sonorants
> or voicesless consonants.  I.e. -n, -r, -l, -t,
> -s.

Got it.

> There is currently a contradiction for the
> plural ending -s that
> produces more complex clusters like -ls or -ts.
>  Either I will allow
> such clusters in the singular, too, or I define
> that a very recent
> shift has produced these clusters (e.g. by
> defining that the older
> plural ending was -es), after the -e in the
> stem had dropped/not
> dropped earlier.

Interesting stuff! It certainly adds depth to a
conlang to consider details like this.

Padraic

> 
> **Henrik
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~--> 
> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups
> email.
>
http://us.click.yahoo.com/4It09A/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/GSaulB/TM
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> romconlang-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
> 
> mailto:romconlang-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 


Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios asteros; tamenio
vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem emduriase!
    --Pomperios Perfurios.

--

Ill Bethisad --
<http://www.bethisad.com>


Come visit The World! --
<http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/>







.