[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On 08/12/2006 03:13, Eric Christopherson wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Carl Edlund Anderson wrote:What was the likely original pronunciation of gu-, representing borrowedGermanic w-, in Romance and how did it develop? Was it originallysomething like /gw/, later developing to /g/, or was it simply /g/ fromthe beginning?Originally it would have been /gw/, which might have been pronounced [Gw] depending on time and place. I'm not sure why it wasn't borrowed simply as /w/; perhaps because the Latin /w/ had already shifted in most cases to /v/, so there were no initial /w/s. As for why a velar stop rather than some other kind, it's probably because /w/ is labiovelar.
Thanks :) Is there any sense on the dates (different in different places?) for shifts from /gw/ or /Gw/ to plain /g/?
Cheers, Carl -- Carl Edlund Anderson mailto:cea@hidden.email http://www.carlaz.com/