[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Latin x in 're:x'



--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, theiling@... wrote:
> 
> Is it known whether _x_ in Latin _re:x_ was voiceless /ks/ or voiced
> /gz/?  Since the stem is in -/g/, I'm not sure.
> 
> So is there a difference in pronunciation compared to _pax_, whose stem
> ends in -/k/?
>
No difference at all: they're both /ks/. The final stop assimilates in
voicing to the -s. The Roman grammarians tell us that "urbs" was
pronounced as if spelled "urps"