[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] Re: Newbie



Anton Sherwood scripsit:

> If two languages on previously unexplored islands are found to share 
> most of their vocabulary but no grammatical forms, linguists generally 
> assume that one was "relexified" from the other by an event such as the 
> Norman conquest of England.  Only if they share grammatical patterns are 
> they considered truly related.

There are occasional counterexamples.  That village on the Marathi/Kannada
border has a local dialect of each language (and of Urdu, too) that
match *perfectly* in morphology and syntax: only the vocabulary
distinguishes them, and they are utterly distinct because of it.
The assumption is that the dialects have accommodated to one another
to the point where there is only one grammar in the speakers' heads.

-- 
My corporate data's a mess!                     John Cowan
It's all semi-structured, no less.              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    But I'll be carefree                        jcowan@hidden.email
    Using XSLT                                  http://www.reutershealth.com
On an XML DBMS.