[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- Adam Walker <carrajena@hidden.email> wrote: > ju = I > tu = you (inf) > vosu /-a = you (formal m/f) This I like, the m/f distinction. Is there a reason it doesn't happen in the informal forms? I also like the t- / v- split for normal / formal in _both_ numbers. > jun = he > jan = she > jid = it I like the sound of these. It almost looks like unus/-a/-um might have been the cause of some contamination in there, along with id. > nos = we > tus = you (inf pl) > vosus /-as = you (formal pl m/f) > juns/jans/jids = they Same as above, especially the addition of tu to the plural normal form. That's a neat system! > Comments? Only one: you _really_ need to do this in plain text with a conventinal quoting scheme! None of the other yahoo users' mais come out all screwy (and marginally legible) like yours do. There is a mail options link that can take care of this problem! Padraic. ===== parla, mays ben parla; et pharleir becko il maboun. .