[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 16:01:24 -0600 Eric Christopherson <rakko@hidden.email> writes: > Nope. Looks really cool :) - Thanks! > I'm wondering though if it'd make sense to have suffixed pronouns > the way > some Semitic languages do (I'm not sure if ancient Hebrew had those > or not). Maybe just in certain "tenses": > Well, just an idea. - I was thinking of that for object pronouns... which i forgot to make ;-) hmm... eg, = mi: tu: = ti: hac, = ho:nec, ha:jic, = henec, no:s = a:no:s jo:s = a:jo:s hi:d,e: = ho:yed, hajde: = ha:yed, So "i love you" would be _ammo:t,i: (eg,)_, and "she was breathed by us" would be _sp,i:ra:t,u:ye:s ha:jic pel-manni: no:s_. > Also it might be kinda cool to borrow hu and hi right from Hebrew, > since the > Latin forms are pretty similar. (Although I do like ha^jic a lot.) > > -- > Eric Christopherson / *Aiworegs Ghristobhorosyo - Hmm... that could work? But don't pronouns have to be really similar to be borrowed across languages? How close were the English and Norse pronouns that gave us "they"? (i think that was the one) -Stephen (Steg) "i don' wanna be maggerstate of this stinkin' town anymore..." ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.