[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
"maikxlx" <maikxlx@g...> wrote: > (cu prami (lo ninmu) (ro nanmu)) if we adopt a convention that > places the header first, or just as well as: > > ((lo ninmu) cu prami (ro nanmu)) if we opt to maintain the > word order. Either way works fine. I mistakenly switched <lo ninmu> and <ro nanmu> in the above two parses. I hope that this error was transparent and that my intention was still clear. Regards --- Mike