[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ceqli] Re: Xyen



Okay, getting wild here, imagine Ceqli without semivowel letters, and the i
and u allowed to become semivowels in juxtapostion with other vowelsl   We
could say that there are only a few diphthongs:

ai, ei, oi, au

ua, ui, ue

ia, io, iu

When any other vowels come together, they are pronounced separately, the
diphthongs above are always pronounced as one syllable.  It would be allowed
to pronounce the diphthongs os two syllables IF the word is stressed as
though it was one syllable.  That's to accomodate people for whom the
diphthongs are difficult.   So "bien" could be said bi-EN or BYEN.  "Paio"
would be PA-yo or PA-i-o. Loglan is a bit this way, but it allows the stress
to change, I think.

Then the rule changes for stress, only in that we make it "vowel or
diphthong," instead of just vowel.   That is, stress is on the next-to-last
syllable if the morphem ends in a vowel or diphthong.  On the last syllable
if it does not.

Then we'd have these differences:

Words like cwa and bwa would become cua and bua, but would be pronounced the
same way.

It would no longer be possible to have a word like 'dia' pronounced 'DI-a'.
It would be one syllable.  It could, I suppose, be spelled "diia", giving
"DI-ya"

And, if we do all that, what would we use y and w for?

Rex F. May (Baloo) 
Visit my website at:
http://homepage.mac.com/rmay/
Great leadership training for boys at:
http://afewgoodkids.com
Strange language from an alternate universe at:
http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Texperanto.html