[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
A reply I posted to a thread on sci.lang > > Nathan> These aren't just rare issues that pop up once in a blue > Nathan> moon in language --- these are commonly used in everyday > Nathan> speech. If Esperanto is easy to learn (or, in the context > Nathan> of this subthread, easier than Malay), shouldn't all, or > Nathan> at least most, of these everyday phenomena be regular and > Nathan> predictable? And wouldn't eliminating plural marking > Nathan> altogether (especially unnecessary noun-adjective > Nathan> agreement) make it that much easier? > > I can't agree more! Esperanto estas malbondesegnita kaj malfacila. > Mi ne diru ion tiel fortan, sed la lingvo certe povus esti pli bone desegnita kaj pli facila. Eble vin plibone plachus mia lingvo, Ceqli, kies nomo estas farita de pecoj de la nomoj CHInese kaj ENGLIsh: http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Uploadexp.htm Bwi buba go bol ba hu code silno, hijiq to bol haba xurde fey je skim hu plubon kay plu dilo. Hayfey ke zi plukyer gode bol, hu ceqli, hu cetside kyam je befar vozu tayl hu bol hu Caynbol kay hENGLabol: http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Uploadexp.htm -- Rex F. May (Baloo) Daily cartoon at: http://www.cnsnews.com/cartoon/baloo.asp Buy my book at: http://www.kiva.net/~jonabook/book-GesundheitDummy.htm