[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Leth not ekthclude lithperdh from our midthdt!



My goodness!  Why would you want to diverge from both
the IPA as well as common international usage to the
extreme of no longer being able to represent in Ceqli
so many common sounds of other languages?  The IPA
adds [t] and [d] to "x"[S] and to "j"[Z] to represent
"tc/tx"[tS] and "dj"[dZ], and is still able to
represent the similar but different "ty"[tj] and
"dy"[dj] sounds.  Indonesian ended up replacing "dj"
with "j" and using "c" for the [tS] sound!  If you
must replace the "x"[S] and "j"[Z] in "tx" and "dj"
with a palatisation sign then why are you choosing "j"
over "y"?  You might wish to be able to represent the
schwa by using say [&} or ['] for transcription of
English but you wouldn't want to have the schwa as a
distinctive vowel of Ceqli because it is so close to
the articulation of any of the 5 clearly distinct
vowels. The Japanese Department of Education has tried
for over one hundred years without any success
whatsoever to push the romanisation TYA-TYU-TYO,
ZYA-ZYU-ZYO and SYA-SYU-SYO instead of the almost
universally used romanisation CHA-CHU-CHO, JA-JU-JO
and SHA-SHU-SHO; every other governmental and
non-governmental agency in Japan (including every
private educational institution and even every public
university) still prefers CHA-CHU-CHO, JA-JU-JO and
SHA-SHU-SHO! If you are impelled to use digraphs in
any case for such interlinguistically common sounds
like [tS], [dZ], then better to use the digraphs "th"
and "dh" for the sounds in "thing" and in "the" rather
than lose the valuable single letters "c" and "j" for
sounds that aren't even in most European languages let
alone in other language groups.  I don't understand
how you can claim that the palatizations tj, sj, dj
and zj are not digraphs (two signs representing a
single sound)? They are just as much digraphs as are
the internationaly recognised "ch", "sh" and "zh". 
While "j" represents "y" in IPA, internationally it is
recognised as [dZ].  I prefer the internationally more
common sounds [S], [tS] and [dZ] to be represented in
Ceqli by "x", "c" and "j" respectively, and to use
digraphs "zh", "th" and "dh" for the less common
sounds [Z], [T] and [D]. However if you must have
symmetry then use "c" and "j" for "sh" and "zh", and
make these sounds in Ceqli either more common than or
alternative pronunciations of "tc" and "dj".  Same
argument goes for either "t" and "d" or else "s" and
"z" to be used as alternative pronunciations for words
of English containing [T] and [D] that might be
borrowed into Ceqli.  Dhath thayetht Dharathuthtra....
(Leth not ekthclude lithperdh from our midthdt!) 
 
Ray Bergmann

> Message: 1
>    Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:49:51 -0600
>    From: Rex May - Baloo <rmay@hidden.email>
>> 
> Changes to the current phonology, based on
> suggestions from everybody:

> C  as in CHew     as in THree, wiTH
> J  as in meaSure  as in You, buY
> X  as in   SHoe   as in THe, weaTHer
> You'll note that C and J have been liberated to
> serve as the two Th sounds.
> I wanted the following:
> 
> Use only the ascii 26 and no less.
> Keep a symmetry /S, Z/ and /tS, dZ/ all represented.
> Have a schwa
> 
> Now, we can't do this unless we represent the old C
> and J with digraphs,
> UNLESS we agree that in Ceqli the /j/ sound
> palatizes the preceding
> consonant.
> 
> Thus.  c > tj  x > sj,  j > dj,  (the unrepresented
> /Z/) > zj.
> 
> So 'j' serves to palatize, and also serves as a
> semivowel in diphthongs, and
> it is _not_ a digraph.
> 
> So, alas, it becomes Tjeqli.
.................
> I should add that I figure we should disallow the
> 'y' sound after s and z
> anyway, as they tend to get confused with sh and zh
> sounds.  So in setting
> sj and zj equal to those latter sounds, we haven't
> lost anything in any
> case.
.....................
 The existence of x for /D/ and c for /T/ opens up a
> lot of possibilities.
> First off, the 'the' words  can all have the shape
> xV(V).  Xy will be
> pronounced like unstressed English 'the' and simply
> be a noun marker.  Xa,
> xi, xi, etc. will have different the-ish meanings.


http://greetings.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Greetings
- Send your seasons greetings online this year!