[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Glosa fu/du/pa (was: Aspect)



--- In txeqli@y..., "John Schilke" <doc@c...> wrote:
> Glosa has this business of "fu," "du," "pa" for tenses (only 
> if needed) and often it remains unused.

As a semi-fluent Glosa speaker, I have to chime in here. On a 
side note, there is some substantial disagreement on the Glosa 
list right now about tense, aspect, etc. It seems that the Glosa 
system isn't quite complete.

Anyway, the real point I wanted to make is that in Glosa, these 
tense markers (plus "nu" [now]) double as verb phrase markers. 
When you encounter one, you know you have left the subject and 
are entering the verb. Similarly, "u" and "plu" are the main 
noun phrase markers that let you know the verb is finished. 
There seem to be others, like "mi", but there is no concrete list 
so it is open to interpretation.

Unfortunately, because these markers are optional, it is often 
difficult to parse sentences correctly. Generally it is possible 
by context, but often it requires one or more restarts because 
you hit a dead end.

One example was when I recently said "mi volu auxi". I intended 
the meaning as "I want to-help", but it can equally be 
interpreted as "I want assistance". Even if I had said "mi nu 
volu auxi", it wouldn't have helped. 

The only way my meaning would be clear would be if the NP marker 
was required instead of being optional. Then, because I didn't 
say "mi nu volu u auxi", readers would KNOW that auxi was still 
part of the verb phrase.

I hope Ceqli is able to avoid this confusion. I strongly believe 
that you should be able to parse almost any sentence in one try. 
It may take some context to grasp the intended meaning, but not 
the intended structure.

In a language like Glosa, where any word can be used as (almost) 
any part of speech, and where you don't know a word's part of 
speech by the way it is spelled, I think the best way is to have 
mandatory markers between the subject, the verb, and the object. 
This could be a single marker, or it could be a specific list of 
types of words that can serve that purpose.

Just my opinion, based on real-world Glosa experience.

Kevin